The Radeon RX 5600 XT’s specs inform its whole story: it options 36 compute items and a couple of,304 stream processors — the identical because the Radeon 5700, however with slower clock speeds between 1,375MHz and 1,560MHz. It additionally sports activities 6GB of GDDR6 reminiscence, 2GB lower than the 5700. Surprisingly, that is 2GB lower than the entry stage RX 5500, however AMD says the 5600 additionally has round 30 p.c extra reminiscence bandwidth, which makes up for the distinction. When measured in teraflops, that truly places the RX 5600 (7.19 TFLOPS) nearer the 5700 (7.95 TFLOPS) than it does the 5500 (5.2 TFLOPS). Although, it is nonetheless nicely shy of the 5700 XT’s 9.75 TFLOPS.
3DMark Timespy/Timespy Excessive Hitman 2 Future 2 Witcher three Radeon 5600 XT 6,689/three,319 83 FPS 100-120 FPS 90-100 FPS Radeon 5700 7,950/three,672 106 FPS 95-130 FPS 92-105 FPS Radeon 5700 XT Eight,506/three,871 107 FPS 100-135 FPS 100-120 FPS RTX 2060 Tremendous Eight,574/four,015 108 FPS 93-110 FPS 86-90 FPS
1080p benchmarks with highest graphics settings
As you possibly can most likely inform from the GPU’s specs, the RX 5600 XT is not that far off from the 5700, performance-wise. The truth is, each playing cards carried out equally in Hitman 2 and Future 2 with excessive graphics settings at 1080p and 1,440p. The Witcher three, a notoriously demanding recreation, reveals extra of a distinction between the 5600 and 5700, however even then the costlier card is simply round barely quicker in 1080p and 1,440p. (Word: At first, the 5600 additionally shocked us by outscoring the 5700’s 3DMark outcomes from our preliminary evaluate. However after re-testing the RX 5700, its clear that its efficiency has dramatically improved with newer drivers.)
After all, there’s greater than only a efficiency distinction between the 5600 and AMD’s extra highly effective playing cards. The Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT we reviewed appears and feels considerably cheaper than the reference 5700 and 5700 XT GPUs we noticed final 12 months. On the one hand, that may not matter a lot because it’s caught in your case more often than not, however the flimsiness of the shroud might trigger points as you are putting in it. And that case additionally covers the GPU in a means that makes it arduous to plug within the required Eight-pin energy connector with out some critical finger gymnastics (to not point out scraped knuckles).
The 5600 XT’s cooling system is efficient, although: throughout our testing, it hovered between 65C and 70C below load, whereas its extra highly effective siblings reached as much as 90C. The Sapphire’s giant followers had been loud, they don’t seem to be a lot of an issue when you’re utilizing a headset. However, in order for you, you possibly can decrease the fan velocity by AMD’s Radeon software program, in change for barely larger working temperatures.
The Radeon RX 5600 XT’s true energy is its worth. You’ll be able to anticipate to see playing cards just like the Sapphire Pulse for round $289, whereas 5500 GPUs go for round $180, and the 5700 begins round $330. The 5700 XT, AMD’s strongest GPU, sells for $400. And it is price noting, when you’re solely involved about hitting 60 FPS in 1080p, then you would save $100 by going for a Radeon RX 5500.
Whereas I have never examined NVIDIA’s GTX 1660 Ti desktop GPU, which generally goes for $300, AMD claims the RX 5600 is round 20 p.c quicker with AAA titles like Gears 5 and Pink Lifeless Redemption 2. Based on Futuremark’s database, the 1660 Ti scores 6311 on common with the Time Spy 3DMark check, which is round 300 factors decrease than the 5600.
Merely put, the Radeon RX 5600 is among the finest choices at the moment in order for you probably the most fragging bang on your buck. It is quick sufficient to ship excessive framerates in 1080p (and in lots of circumstances 1,440p); it would not generate a lot warmth; and most significantly, you possibly can nab it below $300. 1080p gaming is not probably the most thrilling subject today, however AMD deserves credit score for letting gamers get probably the most out of that decision, with out the expense of leaping to 4K.